cyberplace.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Cybersecurity, fandom, video games, technology, dog photos and most importantly, you.

Server stats:

942
active users

Five orgs have told me they are running incidents for Snowflake, where their data has been copied.

Snowflake: there is absolutely no cybersecurity incident.

Also Snowflake: Please run these commands and look for "threat activity" logins with the user agent "rapeflake" using this knowledge base article we haven't listed on our website.

community.snowflake.com/s/arti

I've now confirmed 6 major orgs running Snowflake cyber incidents, so I've made a theme song about Snowflake's response.

The deleted Hudson Rock post on Snowflake breach: web.archive.org/web/2024053114

For the record I don't think all the content is accurate - however Snowflake did have a security incident via their former employee, they have full IR stood up. They didn't follow their own best practices.

I also know multiple orgs who've had their full databases taken from Snowflake.

web.archive.orgSnowflake, Cloud Storage Giant, Suffers Massive Breach: Hacker Confirms to Hudson Rock Access Through Infostealer InfectionHudson Rock is able to confirm a massive breach at Snowflake was caused by credentials compromised via an Infostealer infection.

The Snowflake authentication setup is terrible.

MFA can’t be enabled org wide, each user has to manually log in and enable it. There’s no policy to block users without MFA. And it uses Duo MFA rather than your orgs MFA. (You can bring your own MFA with SAML).

Also all users log in via a Snowflake domain, so you can just pull creds from info stealer marketplaces or logs.

That’s why they’re being targeted as a platform.

Hudson Rock have put out a statement saying a legal threat from Snowflake caused them to remove their blog. linkedin.com/posts/hudson-rock HT @mattburgess

One thing I didn't know until recently is Snowflake has a massive fanbase, Apple and Amiga style - if you critique Snowflake in any way people flip tables. The comments on my blog are fun. I mean, the clue is in the product name, really.

IMHO it's fair to call out Snowflake's authentication isn't very good - it's the worst SaaS MFA solution I've seen as it has no top level, easy switch for org wide MFA enforcement.

Combined with putting all customers under *.snowflakecomputing.com sub domain is why their customers are getting owned - infostealers are just full of creds ready to go.

I gather Snowflake are discussing changes to fix, don't tell the fanboys (and yes, they're all dudes).

Kinda interesting - Mandiant notified Snowflake that over 100 customers had data exfil issues, and Snowflake’s share price immediately began to tank in sells offs - before the incident was made public.

✅ won a game of Call of Duty
✅ hacked the world’s largest companies
✅ used an infostealer

Can’t wait for these guys to have super secure Microsoft Recall, which is definitely encrypted from the user 🤪🤪🫡

bleepingcomputer.com/news/secu

Snowflake have told customers "We are also developing a plan to require our customers to implement advanced security controls, like multi-factor authentication (MFA) or network policies, especially for privileged Snowflake customer accounts."

Good! They also say the attack was "not caused by a vulnerability, misconfiguration, or breach of its product". Just happy little bad MFA.

Nice: "In a phone call this week, Jones (Snowflake CISO) told WIRED that Snowflake is working on giving its customers the ability to mandate that users of their accounts employ multifactor authentication going forward, “and then we’ll be looking in the future to [make the] default MFA,” he says."

This will be a great outcome for Snowflake customers and Snowflake itself. I know Snowflake got big mad at me for pointing it out, but that was a prime weakness in their MFA.

wired.com/story/epam-snowflake

I think SaaS providers who provide their own authentication have a responsibility to provide robust, *enforceable* MFA for their customers - so if an org wants all their users to require MFA, they can and it’s just an easy tick box.

Some SaaS providers aren’t doing this - - and it’s the reason infostealer logs are such a problem. Their angle is customer is solely responsible, but as a counterpoint: see how that is working out for Snowflake.

Snowflake have rolled out MFA changes:

- A new authentication policy that requires MFA for all users in a Snowflake account

- prompting for user-level MFA setup

- Snowflake Trust Center for monitoring adherence to MFA policies

This solves all the inherent product weaknesses from the prior setup, they did a good job.

snowflake.com/blog/snowflake-a

Snowflake · Snowflake Admins Can Now Enforce Mandatory MFALearn about new capabilities that help Snowflake users prompt for multifactor authentication and enforce MFA compliance.

The person who got arrested for this is likely a kid btw, there’s a bunch on Telegram who operate with terrible OPSEC.

Turns out yeeting your most sensitive data into a “AI Data Cloud” with no enforceable (at the time) MFA was a bad idea.

An observation - AT&T, which today announced the biggest data breach of any telco worldwide ever - is down 0.35% on stock market

Snowflake, who own the SaaS platform, are down another 2%, 15% down over 3 months

Each breach has driven Snowflake’s share price down, but not their customer’s share price

In other words: 2024 reality, if you’re a SaaS provider, infostealers and cyber crime groups are a competitor - you have to be shit hot at authentication (even if it inconveniences the customer)

The AT&T Snowflake database wasn’t a law enforcement database, that is false.

They’re a major Snowflake customer, they put CDR in to do data analysis.

They subscribe to Snowflake Telecom Data Cloud and push petabytes of data in, as do other telcos. Snowflake had no way to mandate MFA on local accounts (that is fixed now).

The latest Snowflake quarterly results dropped on Wednesday so I looked at their investor presentation, to see what they said about the security incident.

Nothing.

The company's net loss widened to $317 million, from $227 million during the same period a year earlier but this isn’t unusual, they have had accelerated losses for some time.

I should loop this in for more crazy on the Snowflake non-incident incident, where a bunch of teens ran around the poor security at both Snowflake and Snowflake's customers.

wsj.com/tech/cybersecurity/hac

Boggles the mind that nation state China managed to get into various US telcos.. and so did a 20 year old kid, who had to be doxxed by @briankrebs to even get arrested.

I'm hoping this one goes to trial so the feds are forced to reveal what happened - as I understand it, various telcos exported CDRs - call record data - and put it into Snowflake Telco Cloud, which didn't have a feature to require MFA for every telco user account, and some users forgot to enable it.

krebsonsecurity.com/2024/12/u-

krebsonsecurity.comU.S. Army Soldier Arrested in AT&T, Verizon Extortions – Krebs on Security
Kevin Beaumont

Snowflake incidents explained (the design has since changed)